A follow-up on my post from this morning

"sm70- why not Duesenberg?" (sm70-whynotduesenberg) 04/03/2017 at 17:10 • Filed to: None

3

21

Oh dear god, the horror. Truly a fate worse than death. Anybody that puts me in !!!error: Indecipherable SUB-paragraph formatting!!! after I go is gonna get the living shit haunted out of them.

BlueMazda2 - Blesses the rains down in Africa, Purveyor of BMW Individual Arctic Metallic, Merci Twingo > sm70- why not Duesenberg? 04/03/2017 at 17:13

3

Quite mortifying, really.

sm70- why not Duesenberg? > BlueMazda2 - Blesses the rains down in Africa, Purveyor of BMW Individual Arctic Metallic, Merci Twingo 04/03/2017 at 17:16

3

That styling really sucks the life out of you.

Textured Soy Protein > sm70- why not Duesenberg? 04/03/2017 at 17:19

4

That looks fine, mostly.

Now if you want horror, witness the Intercar Chrysler CR400.

sm70- why not Duesenberg? > Textured Soy Protein 04/03/2017 at 17:19

0

That certainly falls further down the spectrum of “bad”.

bwp240 > sm70- why not Duesenberg? 04/03/2017 at 17:27

6

Could be worse...

If only EssExTee could be so grossly incandescent > sm70- why not Duesenberg? 04/03/2017 at 17:35

5

If only EssExTee could be so grossly incandescent > Textured Soy Protein 04/03/2017 at 17:37

2

Better?

Daily Drives a Dragon - One Last Lap > sm70- why not Duesenberg? 04/03/2017 at 17:41

2

Holy shit I’d take rolling my body into a meat grinder over that.

Jake - Has Bad Luck So You Don't Have To > sm70- why not Duesenberg? 04/03/2017 at 17:45

1

That looks awesome.

BlueMazda2 - Blesses the rains down in Africa, Purveyor of BMW Individual Arctic Metallic, Merci Twingo > sm70- why not Duesenberg? 04/03/2017 at 17:47

3

Then again, there are some people who might think the styling is to die for.

sm70- why not Duesenberg? > bwp240 04/03/2017 at 17:51

1

That is indeed worse.

sm70- why not Duesenberg? > If only EssExTee could be so grossly incandescent 04/03/2017 at 17:51

2

Christ on a cracker...

sm70- why not Duesenberg? > Jake - Has Bad Luck So You Don't Have To 04/03/2017 at 17:53

0

If only EssExTee could be so grossly incandescent > sm70- why not Duesenberg? 04/03/2017 at 18:10

3

That’s called a “eucharist wafer”.

xyzabc > sm70- why not Duesenberg? 04/03/2017 at 18:16

1

Makes “ Burial at Sea ” a pretty attractive option.

Tim (Fractal Footwork) > sm70- why not Duesenberg? 04/03/2017 at 19:07

1

To quote Colour Revolt, “One man’s limo is another man’s Hearse.”

sm70- why not Duesenberg? > If only EssExTee could be so grossly incandescent 04/03/2017 at 19:14

0

That doesn’t make for as good of an exclamation though.

IAN_Z > sm70- why not Duesenberg? 04/03/2017 at 20:00

1

I fear the Enclave much more than I fear death

Jake - Has Bad Luck So You Don't Have To > sm70- why not Duesenberg? 04/03/2017 at 20:43

0

It’s better than the caddy, at least. Looks fairly butch, moreso than a regular Enclave.

ranwhenparked > sm70- why not Duesenberg? 04/03/2017 at 21:24

1

Yeah, I kind of wonder if there isn’t a market for a traditional, body-on-frame full-size sedan for the dedicated fleet market - limousines, car services, funeral cars, taxi cabs (for cities that don’t require handicap access), police cars, government vehicles. They all have a lot of common requirements, to the extent that the same model that excels at one excels at all of them, and if you add them all together, you probably do have enough volume to make it work.

You could sell a few to consumers, for those with those sorts of tastes, or you could skip the consumer market entirely to avoid CAFE issues.

Svart Smart, traded in his Smart > sm70- why not Duesenberg? 04/04/2017 at 00:27

1

I don’t hate this, except that it’s built from a Buick Enclave and has fake landau bars.